This article highlights location trends within the metalworking sector. The main focus will be on applied metal products, which range from forgings to machine tools. In the article we will not address the basic metals sector (e.g., smelting) as site selection criteria are more unique (e.g., abundant/low-cost energy).
The metalworking industry as it pertains to this article covers NAICS codes 332 (Fabricated Metal Products), 333 (Machinery) and 3315 (Foundries). These industries comprise mostly capital goods, displaying similar marketplace trends, production requirements and location criteria. It should be noted that electrical equipment/appliances, motor vehicles and aerospace are sometimes lumped into metalworking. But their operational needs are different and hence, for purposes of this article, are excluded.
In the U.S., the metalworking industry (NAICS 3315, 332 and 333) employs 2.63 million workers. Most businesses are small to mid-size (under 100 employees). Annual sales over the last four quarters registered an estimated $748.5 billion. Exports accounted for about 15 percent of gross revenue volume.
Steady growth has been exhibited by the U.S. metalworking industry since 2011. Fueling growth has been the gradual economic rebound in North America, increased capital spending by U.S. businesses and solid exports (in part due to favorable currency exchange rates).
Over the next three years, growth should persist at a moderate pace. The U.S. economy will continue to expand. Additionally, Europe seems to be coming out of the economic doldrums. Asia should also perform well even if China’s economic growth is more moderate than earlier in the decade.
Unless the U.S. dollar dramatically rises against other major currencies, exports should remain healthy. A majority of economists believe that the USD will advance by no more than five to seven percent versus other key currencies over the next couple of years. Furthermore, companies in emerging countries will accelerate investment in new technology, which should help U.S. exports. Five major reasons U.S. metalworking companies are globally competitive embrace:
Innovation (product enhancement and new products)
Process improvement (introduction of the latest technologies)
High-quality products (perform well with minimal defects)
Ability to customize products on relatively short notice
Better management of the end-to-end supply chain (cost, efficiency, flexibility, risk).
These market forces bode well for new plant creation and existing facility expansion in the U.S. Many of the new production entities will serve regional markets as customers demand rapid delivery, customization and minimal inventory carrying costs.
Foreign producers will also play a conspicuous role in the coming production capacity increase in the U.S. As before, the major players will be companies from Germany, UK, Nordic countries, Japan and South Korea. Importantly, there will also be significantly more inward investment activity from BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) metalworking manufacturers.
Historically, this industry has been concentrated in states with the densest clustering of manufacturing, transportation and utility industries. This pattern still holds true but two other dynamics have opened up other doors. These are lower-cost states within reasonable distance of major customers and/or centers of fast growth energy development (including alternative energy and shale gas).
The map below shows the proportion of metalworking employment per 1,000 workforce for all states. The most significant clustering occurs in the Midwest and Upper South. West of the Mississippi River, Texas and Oklahoma are well represented. States shown on the following list have an above average presence of the metalworking sector (as measured by employment per 1,000 workers).
Ratio of Metalworking to
(per 1,000 Employees)
Future metalworking site selection will occur throughout the U.S. Among the highest growth regions will be the Southeast, selected Midwest states, Great Plains (energy-producing states) and the Gulf Coast. Best performing states will be those characterized by market proximity, moderate business cost, favorable business climate, surplus labor pools and superior transportation infrastructure.
The emphasis placed on various location criteria will vary by each company’s unique needs/requirements. However, there are a number of criteria which tend to be important to very important for most metalworking site selection projects. These are as follows:
Frequently within next-day delivery, by motor carrier, of key customers
In siting new plants, it is important to also determine if there will be any future changes in the geography of customers
Additionally, if there are multiple plants, which customers are most optimally served from each facility (including the new one)
Within reasonable drive (perhaps 15 minutes) to a limited access, four-lane highway
Uncongested access road to the worksite (beware of railroad crossings with heavy rail traffic)
Ample motor carrier service (TL or LTL with local terminals) including backhaul opportunities (filling empty trailers can result in substantial price discounts)
In some cases, if parts or raw materials are imported, within several hours’ drive of a seaport
For about 15 percent of projects, a rail siding (if a small user such as less than 100 cars a year, be sure the RR will accept that volume)
Maximum drive time to a commercial airport (usually 60-90 minutes)
If parts shipped by air, proximity to a regional small package processing center
Available modern building
Many firms strongly prefer a vacated building to speed up initial production and lower one-time capital cost
Building should be readily expandable
Ceiling heights often 28 or more feet
Open column spacing
Minimum 6” reinforced concrete floor
All utilities in place
Compatible with nearby land uses
Environmentally clean (Phase One assessment completed)
Acceptable soil load bearing and water table
Outside the 100 year (and ideally 500 year) flood plain
Good public services
Acceptable fire insurance rating
Elevated water storage
Good access roads
Excess infrastructure capacity
Surplus electric power
Reliable electric power
In some cases, dual electric power service (from two substations)
Natural gas available
Sufficient water and sewer treatment capacity
Adequate labor supply
Comprises one of the biggest challenges for the industry
Imperative to make certain there is now and will likely be a surplus of requisite skillsets
Requires a quantification of employment by occupation within a 30-45 minute commute and input from local employers on applicant flow/ease or difficulty of hiring (entry-level trainees and experienced workers)
Surplus conditions should exist for positions such as:
CNC machine operator
Tool and die
In some cases, engineers (industrial, mechanical, electrical)
High school and post-secondary training programs for advanced manufacturing trades
Proportion of applicants failing tests, e.g.,
Right-to-work state often desirable (but beware of making this a pre-condition)
Percent private-sector workforce organized
Union organizing activity
Union status of comparable employers
Presence of selected unions, irrespective of industry
Air quality attainment
Good water quality
Hazardous waste storage/transport
Permit approval times
Business operating costs
Wages (most companies prefer to be lower than the U.S. average for most populous positions)
Determine effective starting rate
Ascertain rate of progression to remain competitive in the local market
Gauge whether incentive compensation will be required to successfully staff the new plant
Critical to determine if there will be future wage escalation pressure due to imbalance of supply/demand
Shift premium (necessary to staff off-shifts and weekends)
Overtime policy (e.g., over eight or 40) and ability to staff overtime
Other utilities (e.g., natural gas)
-- Corporate income rate and apportionment formula
-- Property (including exemptions)
-- Sales (including exemptions)
-- Gross receipts
Potential incentives (that can be used by the company), e.g.,
-- Investment tax credit (is it refundable)
-- Job creation tax credit (is it refundable?)
-- Sales tax refunds
-- Property tax abatement
-- Deal closing grant
-- Low interest or forgivable loan
-- Tax increment financing (TIF)
-- Economic development rider for electric power
-- Land/building cost write-down
-- Subsidized pre-employment training (see if funds go directly to company)
-- Applicability of federal incentives (e.g., Work Opportunity or New Market tax credits)
-- Determine eligibility (e.g., wage threshold) and any recapture/claw-back provisions for each incentive
Natural disaster risk (e.g., earthquakes)
Typically the best locations will be those that score high on qualitative factors (e.g., labor market) and offer a moderate-cost environment. Furthermore, there should be confidence that a location’s most compelling advantages will hold up well into the future.
Choosing the Optimal Location
The aforementioned criteria must first be assigned appropriate weights by the project team. Also at the outset of a site selection exercise, it is necessary to delimit year one and future operating requirements. These include headcount, real estate, capital investment, utilities, etc.
Once this spadework is completed, a two-phase process should be followed to select the best location. The process is highlighted below.
Phase One location screening comprises an iterative process wherein areas are systematically eliminated until a short list emerges. Research input embraces tapping databases in early stages and once a manageable number of locations surface, reaching out to economic development groups for more customized information.
Early stage, desktop screen is undertaken in a series of rounds. Statistical thresholds (e.g., population growth rate) are established for each round. Areas are then rejected or retained depending on whether they pass the statistical test. This should lead to a longlist of semifinalist locations (maybe eight-12).
In a second stage effort, prepare a Request for Information (RFI) to send to the lead economic development agency. Here you would be looking for information not found in databases. Examples would embody major employers, new/downsizing employers, available sites/buildings, electric power cost, wage rates from local surveys, motor carrier service, etc.
Statistical and RFI results should be combined to rate/score each area. The weighted model might include categories such as:
Quality of life
The top-rated locations (often three to five) are then carried forward to field investigation (Phase Two). Principal research input involves community visits. The visits are arranged by the economic development group. While in the field, the project team engages in the following:
Orientation briefing by the economic development organization
Confidential interviews with manufacturing companies
Confidential interviews with other pertinent entities such as
State career center (Labor office)
Others as appropriate
Tours of available sites/buildings
Request for and discussion of incentives applicable to the project in question
Request for the economic development agency to provide appropriate details on factors such as sites, permitting, taxes, etc.
The project team compares each short listed area on business operating conditions. Areas are ranked/scored on qualitative and cost factors. Typically a couple of locations are chosen as finalists. The team then conducts due diligence negotiation (e.g., real estate and incentives) in the finalist areas. This leads to selection of the ultimate location (community) and site (property).
The metalworking industry is thriving in the U.S. Both domestic and foreign producers are building new facilities to serve the U.S. and in some cases export markets.
Nearly all regions of the U.S. have and will see new metalworking investment. But areas that are close to customers, display strong labor markets, have excess infrastructure capacity, allow the option of an available building and comprise modest cost alternatives will flourish the most.
While the challenge for companies to find optimal sites can be daunting, adhering to a systematic approach is the only way to go. While many factors are key, there will typically be none more critical than labor supply/quality/cost. To ensure long-range success of a new metalworking plant it is essential that the chosen location can yield an adequate pool of qualified labor at an affordable cost.