September/October 2011 | Trade and Industry Development

September/October 2011

Trade & Industry Development Magazine

Trade & Industry Development - September/October 2011

The manufacturing process has changed dramatically over the years, but at the core it is still the art of creation and production. Everything from shoes to CPUs to airplanes owes its existence to manufacturing. And in the U.S., the long overlooked importance of manufacturing is starting to reemerge. One of the few bright spots in our halting economic recovery has been manufacturing, and now the realization is dawning on policy makers that a “knowledge-based” economy cannot stand on its own and be sustainable unless it is also linked to the application of that knowledge – which means manufacturing.

In this issue, we examine manufacturing from several different angles, and offer advice to executives looking to expand their facilities. Paul Hampton, of Newmark Knight Frank, offers pragmatic solutions to companies that need to add facilities but are also focused on environmental initiatives. In his article on working with utilities, Larry Gigerich, of Ginovus, provides significant insight into what indications to look for in choosing a worthy utility partner. And Harry Moser, founder of the Reshoring Initiative, provides bottom-line value in his examination of the total cost of ownership, and how it relates to sourcing components and siting facilities. Also, Jennifer Alten examines the benefits offered by Foreign Trade Zones, and Linda Dobel takes a look at some of the designated sites in North America. Douglas K. Woods, president of the Association for Manufacturing Technology, provides a clear snapshot of manufacturing in America and the developing trends. And Dennis Donovan, of WDG Consulting, charts the outlook for facility expansions throughout the rest of the year and into 2012.
 

In this issue

The Impact of Utilities on Site Selection Decisions – The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

BY: Larry Gigerich

In today’s world, the impact of utilities and their economic development arms on site selection decisions cannot be understated. In some cases, utilities are government owned, while in others they are private sector entities with shareholders. In either case, the active engagement of utilities in the economic development process can positively or negatively impact the site selection process, depending on the level and quality of interaction. Site selection firms and their clients must have a firm grasp on what is needed from utilities during all phases of a project, from initial research through delivery. Analysis is critical in order to understand capacity, cost and timing issues associated with the project. During the site selection process and prior to the launch of a new facility or building expansion, a key list of issues and requirements should be developed by the consulting firm and its client. The list of key criteria should then be weighted for purposes of analysis, in order for potential locations to be thoroughly vetted. more....